“操纵性”
用英语怎么说？

To combat this digital drift, Frum and Warzel advocate for a more assertive, scrappy professional journalism. They reject the defensive posture of legacy media, arguing that upholding editorial standards like rigorous editing and legal verification has become a countercultural act. In an era where unedited, long-form content is weaponized as a false symbol of transparency, maintaining quality control is paramount. Frum suggests that journalists should expose their methodology to the audience, demonstrating the integrity of their reporting processes. By taking a rejectionist stance towards the term "mainstream media," Frum notes that conspiratorial networks have actually become the dominant force. Therefore, standing up for objective facts and self-correction is an insurgent mission. Rather than passively observing, journalists must actively engage with audiences in good faith, ensuring that democratic institutions and public discourse are not left entirely to the mercy of manipulative algorithms.

为了对抗这种数字化漂移，弗鲁姆和沃泽尔主张建立一种更具担当、更好斗的专业新闻业。他们拒绝传统媒体的防守姿态，认为坚持严格编辑和法律核实等编辑标准已成为一种反潮流行动。在未经编辑的长篇内容被武器化为虚假的透明度象征的时代，保持质量控制至关重要。弗鲁姆建议新闻工作者应当向受众展示他们的工作方法，以此证明其报道流程的诚信。通过拒绝使用“主流媒体”一词，弗鲁姆指出阴谋论网络实际上已成为主导力量。因此，捍卫客观事实和自我纠错是一项具有叛逆色彩的任务。新闻工作者绝不能被动观察，而必须积极且真诚地与受众互动，确保民主制度和公共舆论不至于完全听凭操纵性算法的摆布。