“生物识别”
用英语怎么说？

The contentious battle followed an intricate judicial trajectory. In 2023, a federal judge initially concluded that Apple was not liable for infringement. However, an appellate court subsequently revived the proceedings, culminating in a California jury trial that ruled in Taction's favor, although jurors concluded Apple did not infringe willfully. This massive financial penalty highlights the severe legal perils confronting multinational tech enterprises. Apple continues to navigate numerous high-stakes patent disputes, having recently faced costly penalties regarding proprietary biometric health sensors in separate courtroom confrontations.

这场激烈的争端经历了一条曲折的司法历程。2023年，一名联邦法官最初裁定苹果不承担侵权责任。然而，上诉法院随后重启了审理，最终在加州陪审团审判中作出了有利于Taction的裁决，尽管陪审员认定苹果并非故意侵权。这笔巨额经济惩罚凸显了跨国科技企业所面临的严峻法律风险。苹果目前仍在应对众多高风险的专利纠纷，近期还因专有生物识别健康传感器在另一起法庭对决中面临高额罚款。