“互相排斥”
用英语怎么说？

On one side, you have the longtime Trump aide Peter Navarro, who has said that Trump’s tariffs will raise $6 trillion over the next decade. On another, you have pro-Trump tech folks, such as Palmer Luckey, who have instead claimed that the goal is a world of fully free trade, as countries remove their existing trade barriers in the face of the new penalties. On yet another track, there is Stephen Miran, who has suggested that the tariff salvo is part of a master plan to rebalance America’s relationship with the global economy by reducing the value of the dollar and reviving manufacturing employment. These three alleged goals-raising revenue, restoring free trade, and rejiggering the global economy-are incompatible with one another. The first and second explanations are mutually exclusive. Either global free trade is an economic Valhalla worth fighting for, or it’s the cursed political order that we’re trying desperately to destroy.

一方面，特朗普的长期助手彼得·纳瓦罗表示，特朗普的关税将在未来十年带来6万亿美元的收入。另一方面，像帕尔默·洛基这样的支持特朗普的技术人员却声称，其目标是一个完全自由贸易的世界，因为各国在面临新的处罚时会消除其现有的贸易壁垒。而在另一条路线上，斯蒂芬·米兰则暗示，关税攻势是一项总体计划的一部分，旨在通过降低美元价值和恢复制造业就业来重新平衡美国与全球经济的关系。这三个所谓的目标--增加财政收入、恢复自由贸易和重组全球经济--是互不相容的。第一和第二种解释是互相排斥的。要么全球自由贸易是值得为之奋斗的经济殿堂，要么它就是我们正拼命尝试摧毁的诅咒政治秩序。