“不置可否的法西斯主义者”
用英语怎么说？

I can be critical when the magazine wastes time reviewing ultra-soft targets, but I can’t really gripe when the result is this much fun. Rothfeld demolishes both the latest book from, and the entire career of, Arthur C. Brooks, whose pivot from explicit conservatism to dilettante-bro philosophy she correctly clocks as cowardly. Brooks misinterprets iffy science to provide thin justification for reactionary social politics. Rothfeld takes some combination of surgical strikes and hilarious potshots and points out that the whole book serves to justify the same arguments that explicit white nationalists are making. Of course, a noncommittal fascist is still a fascist. The “all-encompassing blandness” of Brooks’ project will likely prove self-defeating, but that doesn’t make him harmless. Incuriosity may give this cat a long, long life.

当杂志浪费时间评论那些极易攻击的目标时，我可能会持批评态度，但当结果如此有趣时，我就没法抱怨了。罗特菲尔德不仅抨击了阿瑟·C·布鲁克斯的最新著作，还否定了他的整个职业生涯，并正确地指出他从明确的保守主义转向浅薄哲学的做法是懦弱的。布鲁克斯曲解了可疑的科学，为反动的社会政治提供了站不住脚的理由。罗特菲尔德结合了精准打击和有趣的随意抨击，并指出整本书都在为公开的白人民族主义者提出的相同论点辩护。当然，一个不置可否的法西斯主义者仍然是法西斯主义者。布鲁克斯项目的“包罗万象的平淡”很可能会弄巧成拙，但这并不意味着他没有危害。缺乏好奇心可能会让这只猫活得更久。